
Patient-Centered medical homes may reduce health care costs and
improve patient health
By:
Michele A. Masucci & Brooke A. Santeramo, Law Clerk

The
“medical home” model of patient care has been the subject of much attention in
recent years, as many experts believe it has the potential to simultaneously
reduce the cost of health care and improve the overall health and well-being of
patients.
The foundation of the medical home model is the primary care
physician, who is responsible for coordinating all aspects of an integrated
treatment plan for patients with chronic conditions, from ordering laboratory
tests to seeking consults from subspecialists. Proponents of the medical home
model believe that centralization of care will substantially reduce the ordinary
expenses incurred under the fragmented patient care system that currently exists
in America. Under the existing American patient care model, patients typically
visit several different physicians, hospitals, and specialists throughout their
lives, often resulting in expensive and unnecessary duplicative tests, and even
more seriously, in contraindicated medications and treatments. The theory behind
the medical home model is that by providing a central base, or “home,” for the
coordination of patient care, doctors can improve rapport and relationships with
patients as well as prevent unnecessary visits to the emergency room or
hospital.
In 2007, the American Academy of Family Physicians, American
Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, and American Osteopathic
Association released the “Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical
Home,” which set forth the key characteristics of the medical home model. The
following are examples of these principles which illustrate the commitment to
quality centralized patient care:[1]
- Personal physician: each patient has an
ongoing relationship with a personal physician trained to provide first contact,
continuous, and comprehensive care.
- Physician directed medical practice: the
personal physician leads a team of individuals at the practice level who
collectively take responsibility for the ongoing care of patients.
- Whole person orientation: the personal
physician is responsible for providing for all the patient’s health care needs
or taking responsibility for appropriately arranging care with other qualified
professionals. This includes care for all stages of life; acute care; chronic
care; preventive services; and end-of-life care.
- Care is coordinated and/or integrated across
all elements of the complex health care system (e.g., subspecialty care,
hospitals, home health agencies, nursing homes) and the patient’s community
(e.g., family, public and private community-based services). Care is facilitated
by registries, information technology, health information exchange, and other
means to assure that patients get the indicated care when and where they need
and want it in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner.
- Enhanced access to care is available through
systems such as open scheduling, expanded hours, and new options for
communication between patients, their personal physician, and practice staff.
The Adirondack Region Medical Home Pilot, scheduled to commence
in January of 2010, will be New York State’s first large scale medical home
program. Participants in the program include physicians, physician assistants,
nurse practitioners, hospitals, and commercial health plans. Participating
primary care physicians will design integrated care plans for improving their
patients’ health, with particular emphasis on preventative care. Participating
physicians must use an electronic system for maintenance of records as well as
prescriptions, must coordinate treatment plans with other physicians within the
provider group, and must meet established standards of care with regard to
specific indicators of patient health including blood sugar and blood pressure.
The Adirondack program, which will be the largest program of its
kind in the country, will receive $4.5 million in assistance from New York
State, through enhanced Medicaid reimbursements. Primary care physicians will
receive approximately $7 per patient on a monthly basis to offset the cost of
implementing the program. Supporters of the medical home concept hope that the
Adirondack program will serve as a national model for centralized,
patient-centered care.
In 2008, the National Committee for Quality Assurance
established criteria for recognition of existing physician practices as medical
homes. The “Physician Practice Connections—Patient-Centered Medical Home”
recognition program sets forth several aspects of patient care, based upon the
“Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home,” which are necessary for
establishing a medical home, including electronic prescribing and record
keeping, referral tracking, and overall care management. Physician practices
receive a score on a scale of 100 points for each element of the medical home
model, and this score determines whether the practice will be recognized as a
Level 1, 2, or 3 medical home. Research by the NCQA indicates that public and
private health care plans appear willing to provide compensation to physician
practices organized as medical homes in an effort to improve patient health and
reduce avoidable costs.
Current health care reform legislation includes substantial
funding for medical home pilot programs. All health care reform legislation,
including the House Bill, “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009,” the
Senate Finance Committee Bill, “America’s Healthy Future Act,” and the Senate
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee Bill, “Affordable Health
Choices Act,” include provisions for implementing medical home model care
systems.
Existing multispecialty group physician practices are
well-poised to be players in the medical home revolution. For independent
practitioners, the challenge will be one of how to achieve appropriate
integration to be an effective medical home.
-
http://www.acponline.org/pressroom/pcmh.htm
[ Back to Reference ]
With:
Andrew Mintz, Chief Administrative Officer, Preferred Health Partners, a large,
independently owned multi-specialty group practice located in Brooklyn, New York
Question: Large multi-specialty practices
appear to be in the best position to implement the medical home model. How would
small practice groups or independent practitioners be able to achieve a similar
level of patient care coordination?
Answer: It is true that large
multi-specialty groups are basically set up around the medical home model
already, although every individual group would probably require a few
adjustments to bring themselves more precisely in line with the model. Large
practice groups are also in a financial position to make the necessary
investments, particularly in the area of information technology, to make the
medical home model work. For this reason, I don’t see this as a possibility for
small practice groups or independent practitioners, as they aren’t in a position
to make the significant financial investments, including large up-front
administrative costs, that this model requires. However, I do believe that as
the health care industry migrates toward a more standardized electronic format
for creating and recording patient records, this increase in connectivity among
physicians will play an important role in allowing physicians to coordinate
patient care.
Question: Do you believe that the medical
home model should take place on a national scale, through Health Care Reform
legislation?
Answer: Absolutely. Creating efficiency in
the health care industry is the only way to allow the industry to correct itself
without major government intervention. Anytime you coordinate care, it is more
efficient, and it provides patients with better outcomes. The medical home model
allows physicians to expedite the care of the patient, detecting diseases, and
starting interventions early, which enhances patient outcome and increases
longevity of patients.
Submit A Question Or Comment On This Article